Читать книгу: «America under enemy rule and the world as it is», страница 9
Government bureaucracy:
It's a fast growing totalitarian group frequently influenced by the double totalitarian entities: government itself and hostile socialist labor unions.
Legislatures:
As soon as politicians are elected and become the part of the government, they are under increasing pressure to change their loyalty from the constituency to the enemy of the people, the government. The opportunities of the professional career politician are plentiful, the temptations are really strong, and majority of politicians fall for it becoming the element of the government's monster. GOP members lean to be statists, attempting "to solve" the problems caused by too much government, using the same government with inevitable failure. The Democrats are by far worse being double enemies of the people– both as statists and as leftist redistributionists. So far very few politicians in the US (unlike Europe exemplify tripple enemies of the people, as Obama is, adding also the Muslim or pro-Muslim component to the explosive "statist + leftist" mixtrure. Probably, Obama is an atheist, but he is definitely pro-Muslim who enjoys the call to the Muslim prayer as "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth". Remember– Islam is still not purged of the genocidal anti-humane Shariah laws, so we are talking about present islamofascism, the worst totalitarian ideology and practice on the face of the Earth. Solutions? World-wide Shariah laws ban and purging the Shariah laws from Islam making it a normal religion that can coexists with other civilizations.
Femi-nazis, as Pamela Geller calls them. Feminist movement was highjacked by the "progressives", who were long ago persistently infiltrating all the structures that could lead them to the power, as the leftist radical Alinsky tought them. Of course, their "leaders" have nothing to do with the true women's interests protection, they are better defined as the worse enemies of the group they claim to represent, as always the case with totalitarians. All they want is to divide the society, to break it down to as many as possible hating each other special interest groups, to seed animosity and hostility, the gender wars, to undermine free market and individual freedoms. The way they bribe the grassroot base is typical totalitarian "Short term gain for long term pain"– Femi-nazis litigate, twist arms of the society to get the unearned money and benefits to their special interest group on account of the rest of the society. Understandably, this cause the distortions in the Free Market self-regulation mechanisms, thus, worsening the outcome and decreasing individual freedoms and prosperity. In short, Femi-Nazis is one of the detachments of the people's enemies. Solutions? Expose to the Free Market. How? Repeal all this discriminatory "antidiscrimination" laws of the 60-s that give power to the government (remember– powers corrupts) and to the appointed by the government humans (remember– to err is human) to decide, what is discrimination and what is not. Of course, the definition keeps getting broader and broader, because it gives the government more and more powers.
Everything boils down to the only 2 choices we have: whether the power greedy totalitarians (in America's case– "progressive" Democrats) that bring about Euro-socialism with its unintended consequences such as serfdom, destruction and extinction of the nation (but you can be lazy) or "money greedy" Freedom& Free Market lovers that bring us untended benefits of prosperity, freedom and survival (but you need to work hard).
Only Free Market's gentle and invisible hand can sort it out and phase out the discrimination for good without reverse discrimination, because color-blind and gender-blind policies are the most profitable ones and the profit is the driving force behind Free Market, which provides us with 100% of goods and services that we have as unintended benefits, while all we see from the government interventions is unintended consequences. As you know, in one day 1–1–2010 alone the government inacted over 40,000 new laws, mandates and regulations, and the total pile of those government coercions might be a million or so within last 100 years. So, how we can go through all this crap to find a rare gem that we don't want to throw away? And the answer is "No, we can't. But we can repeal automatically the whole million of these laws, the tenticles of the government, and we can have a fresh start from scratch. The hard way to do so was employed during the American Revolution, when the American people repealed all aimed against them British laws, but the price they paid for the fresh start was very high. Today the easiest and the most preferable way to repeal ALL the laws that backed our enemy government's un-Constitutional encroachment into the popular sovereignty territory during last 100 years is a "TWO TERM CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT" that would limit to 2 terms (8 years) not only all elected and unelected government officials and judiciary of all levels, but would automatically let expire every 8 years ALL the active laws. In order to reinstate the extremely rare useful laws, the government bureaucrats will have to prove to us, the people, that this particular law is an exception to the rule and the benefits are actually overweigh unintended consequences. But it must be on a case by case basis, one law at a time, with explicit prohibition to re-instate whole bundles, the packs of the crapy laws. It will keep our enemy bureaucrats busy, won't it? They will have to try to steal our liberties all over again and again from scratch, rather than in today's situation when with each passed law they steal our rights for good, slowly encroaching into people's territory, people's sovereignty.
Then our enemy government's powers will be greatly diminished and ensuing self-regulation by Free Market will gradually solve all the problems that is possible to solve.
IX. Phylosophy of pragmatic neo-centrism
I am not sure all this can be called "a phylosophy"– but what the heck? It's a fashionable word, so let's shape up something that somewhat resembles a phylosophy. Since it is based on definition of "a center" as the state of maximally feasible freedom ( the core freedom), then it should have "centrism" in it. Since all emerging entities like to be called "new", then it will be "neo-centrism". Because it proposes close alliance of all the forces of good, of freedom, based on their today's position relatively to the balance of freedom versus totalitarianism, then it makes sense to name it "pragmatic neo-centrism". So be it, even if it will be the short-lived term. The essence means more than a term. As they say in Russia, it's OK to call me a sweet pie as long as you don't bake me in the oven.
The most important criterion of analysis in this phylosophy is the degree of freedom , which correlates with the strength of the feed-back loop and with the best possible outcome in the instances of the self-regulating processes in multifactorial complex systems in the state of dynamic stability. The importance of the degree of freedom with the feedback loop is in its analytical and predictive powers and in its role as the best possible way to optimize aforementioned complex system in the dynamic stability state. To mention just a few examples of such systems: living organisms, economies and societies. All forces that push today's equilibrium point towards higher degree of freedom for the "end-users" of the system and tighter feedback loop (which in socioeconomic life translates into more individual liberties, more freedom of choice, ultimate popular sovereignty and more free market) are classified as the freedom-camp in political terms and as forces of good in moral terms. Vise versa– all totalitarian forces that diminish the degree of freedom in the system and loosen or eliminate the feedback loop (for example-when totalitarians remove the individual liberties and decision making power from a person and give it to the government or to a similar totalitarian entity) are put to the freedom-haters camp politically. From the moral point of view they are considered forces of evil. In other words, forces of good promote POWER TO THE PEOPLE principle while the forces of evil push for POWER TO THE GOVERNMENT.
Particular political forces shift their orientation, as time passes by (sometimes between elections, sometimes as centuries pass by), and some of them change sides while some stay on the same side of the barricade.
The political center in the pragmatic neocentrism is the core-freedom, the classic liberalism, that is defined by the maximally feasible under current conditions freedoms: free market, individual liberties, popular sovereignty. There is direct correlation between the degree of freedom in socioeconomical life and the freedom and prosperity in the country. As closer to the absolute possible freedom as more productive the society is, the better people fare.Thus, the freedom-loving camp is also called "friends of the people".
Vice-versa: as more totalitarian, the closer to the slavery, the less free society is– the less productive society and the worse the poverty is. Thus, the freedom haters and the people's enemies are interchangable terms in this phylosophy.
When evaluating a proposal, a thesis– don't even look at emotional component, how noble it is and all that crap, and don't look at the stated goal. Instead look at the empiric ned results, and go from there. Whatever shift the balance towards "more freedom to the people" is good, whatever grabs power for the government or totalitarian ideology is bad. It doesn't really matter how you explain the reality as long as you accept it as the objective fact. If you think it is the God's hand– so be it. If you under under the impression that it is just Mother Nature's laws– that's fine too. It is much less important how you explain facts than registering them for what their are. The only thing that matters is that you perceive the reality as it is and deal with it properly. If in contemporary America being religious not only helps shift the balance towards more freedom but actually serves as the number factor in promoting freedom – then I am all for religion by all means, even though I am not religious myself. Islam as of today doesn't count, of course, because as long as it is based on the genocidal Shariah laws it is not a true religion and because it is the worst form ot totalitarianism that not just shifts the freedom balance towards totalitarianism but it completely destroys freedom, and not only the freedom of action– even a freedom of thoughts. If being individualistic and egoistic brings freedom and prosperity to the society-then I am all for the individualism and egoism (even though I am an altruistic semi-individualist). If Free Market, including "evil corporations", actually improves the degree of freedom– then I shall send a "thank you" note to the corporations too, even though I like individual enterprises much more. If a degree of the government control is inversely proportional to the freedom and wellbeing of the nation, then I want as less government as possible, even though I grew up under the total government control. If the democracy under conditions of dominance of the totalitarian ideology (such as "free elections" in the islamofascist Gaza) reduces the degree of freedom, then I am against such democracy. Democracy is not a goal on its own merit, it's just a tool to achieve more freedom, if it works. But if under particular circumstances democracy actually reduces the degree of freedom, if it doesn't work– then to hell with democracy. Block Gaza until its people regain their senses back and kick out the islamofascists themselves. If Pinochet's coup interfered with the rights of 10 thousands of totalitarian communists, of the enemies of the people, but saved from hunger and totalitarian dictatorship millions of Chilians, then the risk/benefit ratio is heavily skewed towards giving Pinochet a Nobel peace prise, even though I wouldn't start the coup myself. If Turkish military will remove from the power Iran's and Syria's friend, formerly stealth and now open islamofascist jihadi Prime Minister Erdogan that poses threat to the Turkish people and to all humanity, then I would not be spanking the military. It's not an unrealistic utopian "noble" goal "justifying" the means, as is always the case with the totalitarian enemies of the people, but it's rather the achieved end-result of "more freedom" justifying the risk/benefit ratio.
X. Who won in 2008 elections?
The short answer is "Enemies of freedom= enemies of America". Do you remember as ALL America's enemies both abroad and within the US were happily endorsing Obama? Plus some useful idiots too were endorsing their enemy, but who counts idiots? Since Obama avoided an audit, we don't know yet how much illegal fund transfers Obama got from the terrorists and enemies of America abroad (Hamas, Lybia, Hizballa, Palestinians and the like). Hopefully, the next Congress will shed some light on this potentially treaterous activities. Well, it's clear why those enemies of America supported Husein Obama: tell me who your friends are and I will tell you who you are. All his friends were, are and will be haters of America, haters of freedom and promoters of all kinds of totalitarianism.
I am sure you ask yourself: "Why Obama and the Democrats in the Congress do this and do that? It is so bad for America!!!"
The answers is : "Exactly!". Yes, EVERY SINGLE THING they do is very bad for America, and that's why they are doing it as enemies of America are supposed to do. That's their job description. They attack freedom and American people from all directions in a very organized and coordinated fashion.
Imagine that a hating America bad guy, for example, both socialist and pro-muslim Saddam Hussein is in the White House and his lap-dog legislators are in the Congress. Then you would not be suprised why they act that way, right? Think about all the things that they would do and then go check the list against Obama's regime "accomplishments" to see if the Hussein Obama's regime is doing exactly the same.
Destroy all things that make America great and exceptional, reduce it to the "just another country", apologize for every aspect of Amerca's greatness. Use "socialization first and then islamization" Check.
Destroy American Constitution and federalism, annihilate people's and states sovereignty, impose unlimited central government. Yes.
Virtually stop the war against the enemies, jihadist terror (even though jihadis exponentially increase their jihad war on bigger and bigger scale around the world and within American borders), stop even calling it islamic terror, preserve the terrorists "rights" over rights of Americans, stop evesdropping on terrorists and instead start evesdropping on dissidents and political opposition". Hmm.. yeah, pretty much "check!" May be because America's enemies are friends of Obama and vice versa– America's friends are enemies of Obama.
Ruin American economy by destroying its competitiveness by everfailing socialist takeover: nationalization of banks, automotive industry, healthcare, financial industry, retirement and insurance funds, using forced unionization and the like. Alas, "check!", there is no more sure way to destroy economy engine than introducing redistributive socialism of any kind– Eurosocialism or communism. Just compare North and South Korea.
Steal American freedoms by forcing socialist labor unions and other socialist contributors to the Husein's campaign, by requiring KGB/Stazi style reporting on all discent directly to the White House, and China-style internet clamping, by spying on us. Check.
Bow to all enemies of America and alienate all America's longstanding friends and allies. Check.
Denigrate America going around the world on apology tour, asking forgiveness for America being the best, for serving as the beacon of freedom and ,thus, the symbol of prosperity and success. Check.
Stop technological advances of America in order to humiliate us, basically stop NASA program, make it serve Obama's Muslim brothers and ask hostile Russian totalitarians to boost American satellites to orbit; stop producing best jet-fighter in the world in order to let totalitarian China soon to be military superpower number 1; unilaterally disarm America while keeping Russia's huge advantage in tactical nukes. Check. Now arabs form UAE are trained by NASA.
Disarm Americans under pretext of the UN "Small arm treaty", destroy 2nd Amendment and render Americans helpless before socialists and islamic supremacists of Obama radical transformation of America: socialization and then islamization. Check.
Destroy the rest of American Constitution by giving away America sovereignty to the totalitarian UN, by submission of America's laws to the written by the unelected UN bureaucrats "protocols", where stoning women to death Iran serves in the "women's right" panel and Syrian dictatorship serves as "human rights" watchdog. Check.
Smear the hard-working Americans and business community that create 100% of America's wealth, while glorifying America's enemies: socialists (including socialist labor unions), islamofascists and the like. Check.
Promore stealth jihad step by step without openly stating objectives (like recent Obama's "victory" in Kenya, where Obama pushed through Shariah laws into Constitution even though only 12% of Kenyans are Muslims. Expect Obama pushing through more Shariah law in America when there are 12% Muslims in America). Check.
There 2 Americas that exist in the parallel Universes: the real dimension where the mainstream is conservatism with its 43% of population along with neither foul nor fish "moderates" limping along (together 80% of population), and America of 20% of delusional "progressive" liberals, and these two Americas are completely incompatible with each other. Unfortunately, those "progressive" aliens from the parallel Universe chose Washington, DC as their infiltration goal and they exert unproportional to their numbers influence in the power structures. How wonderful would be to stop their incursion and send them back to their Utopian world!
And the list will go on and on because Obama is a triple enemy of America (as the Nanny-State statist, as the leftist radical and as a pro-Muslim) while his allies in Washington, DC are mainly double enemies of the American people (statists and lefties). Even Obama's lapdogs in the Congress don't realize that Husein Obama's ultimate goals go much further that theirs: the Left dreams about Euro-style "socialist paradise" while for Obama the final destination is islamic hell.
To compare GOP and the Dems: yes, the Republicans are somewhat better (they don't cause such devistating damage to America as the Democrats), but they are not good enough to reverse the damage when the GOP is in power. The GOP establishment wants to keep Almighty Government as it is. It is happy with the swinging political pendulum in the Washington, DC feeding ground, and they don't want to slash 99% people's enemy, the government, they'd rather use it for their own advantage. Look how GOP elite protects Alaska's Murkowski, a RINO, a traitor that voted with the enemies of the people Democrats 300 times. All kudos to Sarah Palin, a principled conservative that endorsed true conservative Miller. A similar situation happened in Nevada, where true conservative Sharron Engle was attacked for simply stating the fact that in order to prevent nearing fiscal catastrophe we need to phase out the killing America government-run entitlement programs such as SS and Medicare. Sorry, but it is absolutely necessary because it is not sustainable, it is doomed, and it will collapse anyway under the weight of the fiscal and demographic crisis, cause by the "too much government" factor. In near future America will not be able to afford it anyway, so why wait until we waste a couple of trillion dollars and see it collapse anyway? Better to handle it now, before it's too late, in an elective fashion, not procrastinating until the crisis strike. Angle didn't say a word about abrupt termination of the program– no, she correctly stated that there is a need to save the nation by phasing out the entitlement programs that kill America (and are finishing Europe as we speak). Gradual phasing out will prevent demographic and fiscal crises in the US, and it will spare those Americans who have been already robbed by the Washington, DC and THE GOVERNMENT, not you, taxpayers, must foot the government's bill. Pretty good and absolutely real plan is deliniated in the book "Why dovernment doesn't work" by the former USA Presidential candidate Harry Browne. The feds must sell out their assets, including one third of American lands, bought by the feds (shouldn't they use our money to pay off Ameerica's foreign debts instead of federal land grab on top of power and money grab?), and pay their debts to the Americans whose contrubution to the SS and MC was already embezzled by the government the very first minute ot was collected from you under the threat of force. Have you volunteered to pay for these government waste programs? No! The feds must pay THEIR DEBTS, not you, guys! All the government program for now must be made strictly volunteer, no mandates, and if there some stupid folks that rely on the government promises to recover their embezzled money back– let them suffer by choice. If you do not give your explicit consent to take away your money from the paycheck to SS, MC of MA, then the government has no right to steal it from you. I am sure you will find a better way to invest your money when income tax also will be eliminated, and it will double your income right away, because direct and indirect government waste exceeds 57% of the money we make. In short, Engle is absolutely right– to gradually phase out ALL government waste programs is a must in order to save America from Obamunism and from the dying out Euro-Zoo's fate.
