Читать книгу: «America under enemy rule and the world as it is», страница 10
XI. Random thoughts bowl:
This is the box where I trow all random thoughts, sketchy raw ideas for a future book, un-classified yet facts and conceptions, un-organized ideas and proposals that need to be thought over yet. It's like a primary ocean life forms: some of them will perish, but some will give a start to the new beginnings. 2 extremes of the normal thought types are epileptimorphic (sticky, glue-like, tedious,over-detailed but meticulous) and schizoid (jumpy, quick, symbolic and under-detailed, disconnected, chaotic). Being asked to draw a picture reflecting an event, epileptimorphic type will draw you a picture with a thousand of small details, while schizoid type will quickly draw a symbol, claiming it does represent the event (even though in 5 minutes they might forget themselves, what exactly this symbol meant). If you feel that you are more on the over-organized side, then just don't read this chapter to avoid irritation by the random thoughts. Some of them have been elaborated in different chapters already after I picked them from here.
Totalitarians:
Totalitarians (in our case all die-hard Democratic voters, the "progressive" Democrats gang) just love high-jacking all nice-sounding causes that can be used to get political scores in the propaganda war. When they steal the cause, they turn it upside down, actually harming in the long run all those they claim to protect or to represent (because their true intentions are to grab more government, more powers rather than really to help those groups). For example, all Afro-American liberation movement was started by the Republicans while the Democrats did just opposite– they organized KKK and were killing both blacks and white Republicans (the last Democrat KKK activist Sen. Bird just passed away). All first wave of black Congress members were Republicans, Martin Luther King Jr also was a conservative Republican, patriot, freedom-lover (thus, a friend of Israel). However, the Democ-rats have high-jacked the Afro-American cause in order to steal the credit. It's like Muslim Turks 400 years ago destroyed Christian East Rome empire, built the Muslim country on the occupied territory and now they claim as theTurkish historical heritage the remnants of the destroyed by them Christian civilization. The same way, the Dems steal credit for all early successes of the original civil rights movements just because the Dems own their leaders today, just because the Dems have dragged these movements into their enemies-of-freedom camp. Now the Dems destroy black community using "short term gain for long term pain" tactics: they hook black community on narcotics of redistributionist "entitlement" programs that destroy black families and lock the blacks out of healthy competition, thus, locking them up in the cage of welfare and "affirmative" action. Equality of the "progressives" is the equality of the beggars, "social justice" if the legimitized discrimination, robbery and Robin Hood-style redistribution, the end-result is more and more bums in the gutter with no motivation to work hard whatsoever. Why bother if the welfare is enough to get by paying to taxes? The more handouts they give-the more beggars they create. Only free market, free competition will gradually close tha gaps, as was happening before all the "progressive" well-intentioned road to hell of the 60-s. When the families are destroyed by the "progressive" policies, then the 2/3 of kids are raised by the street gangs rather than by 2 parents with ensuing teen-pregnancies and perpetuated vicious cycle of poverty.
The Democrats have always been racists– originally they were anti-black racists, plotting on eliminating the blacks by introduction of Minimum Wage laws (which in the Democrats minds were supposed to starve the blacks to death); now they are overt anti-white racists and covert anti-black racists (because the Democrats "Big Government handouts" policy in the long run keeps minorities in poverty forever). Life is built on paradoxes: all those self-proclaimed "leaders" who claim to represent the interests of the "opressed" ones are in fact their worst enemies, be that minorities, arabs in general and palestinian arabs in particular– you name it. It always works that way: in order to prevent losing their electorate (chich means losing money and power) the "leaders" prevent integration of their constituency by the gentle forces of Free Market, they keep them segregated, weak and hateful. There is nothing that the "progressive"'s Acts of the sixties have accomplished to cure the society's ills because they are based on the usual freedom haters' princilpe: "SHORT TERM GAIN FOR LONG TERM PAIN", on empowering the government "to solve" the problems. Affirmative actions have worsened the productivity of economy by worsening quality of the work force, there are studies that have shown billions and billions of losses to the country due to these policies. All these reforms reversed or at least slowed down the real improvements in the society that slowly but steadily were being accomplished by the forces of Free Market before reforms. Of course, 96% "progressive" media meanwhile have engraved in the public's mind "axioms" that those "reforms" are holy cows and the critical evaluation of whether these "reforms" made America as a whole and less successful minorities better off or much worse is a "NO-NO!", a taboo. Why? Because objective evaluation show that none of the "civil rights" crap works and their the only "accomplishments" are worsening of the "victims" conditions but more power to the government, more poverty, thus, more votes for the Democratic party. For the Democrats the true solution of the problems by Free Market would be the end of the party, no one would vote for them if everybody is a free and successful individual. Their electorate are losers and the rich "emlightened" elite works hard to create as many losers and parasites as they can in order to keep the Democrats in the Washington, DC feeding grounds. According to the 100% of their actions' results– the Democrats despite their empty words and demagoguery in fact don't want to end poverty and discrimination. Just opposite, they want to perpetuate the poverty to preserve their electorate basis. The actions speak volumes, the empty words are empty words no matter how bueatiful they sound.
Worst enemies of the "opressed" ones are their self-proclaimed "saviors" and “representatives”, while the best friend of the "misfortunate" ones is Free Market as the only source of freedom, prosperity and progress on the face of Earth. “Saviors” give them fish and want to keep them as beggars forever, while Free Market teaches them to fish for themselves to be free and independant.
By giving all kinds of handouts to beggars the Democrats; a) feel good about themselves, (which is a paramount to those extravert totalitarian narcissists– they want to feel good about their "noble intentions" even if it means destruction of the whole world in reality); b) increase the size, powers and budget of their instrument of coercion– Big Government; and c) perpetuate the poverty, the beggars class, the "entitlement" population, the eternal Democrats electorate base; d) manage to break up the society to as many sompeting for handouts and hostile to each other groups of special interests as possible rather than uniting as a nation in the pursuit of individual success and happiness. Free Market unites the nation while totalitarian Democrats gang divides it to the special interests groups and seeds animosity between them.
The Democrat gang has also high-jacked the feminist cause even though they just hurt women by pushing them towards unhealthy habits and hazardous work types, unnatural ways of life, ruining normal families that serve as the strong base of a healthy society and the like. Feminist "leaders" along with the rest of the Democ-rats support the worst totalitarians– islamofascists, even though Shariah law demands keeping wives subservient using corporal punishment if needed. Shariah laws also demands stoning a women to death if she was raped. Why feminist "leaders" still support based on Shariah law Islam? Usual paradox of life– the feminist elite don't give a damn about women: they are first of all totalitarian "progressives", and only then women. So, if totalitarian progressivism demands to sucrifice women in order to advance totalitarian cause (islamofascism, for example) then feminists will do just that. It's exactly the same way when 78% of American Jews voted for anti-Semite, anti-Israel Obama, because those "progressive" Jews are not Jews– they are "progressives". The brain behind Obama David Axelrod and money behind Obama Gerge Soros formally are Jews, but in fact they are enemies of Israel. Why? Because they are totalitarian enemies of freedom, and Israel is the island of freedom in the totalitarian Middle East. So, the enemies of freedom are automatically the enemies of Israel. Meanwhile non-Jew Sarah Palin along with all other true conservatives is a friend of Israel for exactly the same reason– Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East, thus, the only true friend of America in the region. Freedom-lovers support each other, just as totalitarian freedom-haters form unholy alliance against Israel (soft Euro-totalitarians are soft enemies of Israel, hard totalitarians of Russia and China are worse enemies, and the worst totalitarians in the world– islamofascists– are hell-bent on destruction of Israel. Totalitarians feel danger– Israel serves as an example in the region that more freedom from the government translates into more prosperity, just like America for 200 years was a living proof of the same fact all over the world). (Of course, it is just a rule with some exceptions– for example, Norquist sounds like a fiscal conservative, but his Palestinian wife every night finds for him very compelling reasons to join the worst totalitarian pro-islamofascism forces, even convincing Bush right after 9/11 to praise Islam as a "religion of peace"). Whatever the totalitarians do– they always hurt society as a whole and they even hurt the particular special interest group members in the long run although they entice them with short term benefits (on account of the rest of society). Only Free Market can sort things out and serve in the long term interests of everyone. Now nascent New Feminism is on the rise, expemplified by Sarah Palin and the wave of conservative women on the way to Congress. They serve united society as a whole, thus, improving positions of the women as the part of society, NOT ON ACCOUNT OF OTHERS.
The Democrats have also high-jacked all other nice-sounding movements (it is also easier to recruit young naive people using such nice sounding baits/causes even though these totalitarian movements in fact are enemies of the people and in the long run they kil the nation), making them a part of the freedom-haters camp, the enemies of the people, and also turning them into exactly opposite of the original movement. It's because the Dems' goal is just to use them in the power struggle, in grabbing more government– they don't give a damn for their constituency's wellbeing. Just opposite– the Dems WANT their electorate base to fail, to stay in poverty and dependancy state indefinitely, so they can have their votes forever. The Dems "love" poor people and they want them to stay that way forever. By the same token, the Dems hate free market as the sole source of progress (because those "progressives" want to be a source of progress), they hate free, prosperous and independant people and they do they best to eliminate them as class. Now Democrats political machine puts under the Dems gang umbrella and controls vote of environmentalists, (turning them into "rats first" and histerical "global warming" freaks), labor movement (turning their leaders into socialist enemies of the American people), the racial minority groups, that demand short term term gains while actually bringing long term pain and all other narcissistic "noble causes". The common features are: the Democrats use short term gains for them as a bait in order to inflict long term pain; they break down society to as many as possible hostile to each other groups; they use them as an instrument to destroy Free Market and to infiltrate all branches of the coercive government; in short– the Democrats push all these movements into the freedom-haters camp, into the enemies of American people camp.
What are the pathways to the decent freedom-lovers and freaky freedom-hating camps?
Freedom-lovers are formed by the long hours of hard work at the work place (they can be rich-business people of the Main Street, or poor YET or middle class, but most importantly they appreciate the fruits of hard labor and the right to keep what you earn); by respect to the wisdom of ages in the form of traditions and ethic code in society; by being religious (I mean true religions– Islam excepted, because Islam is not a religion: as long as it is based on genocidal anti-humane Shariah laws of jihad– Islam in fact is an islamofascism with its own laws, where religion is just a mask); by recognition of the laws of nature (another paradox– the faith in supernatural God with non-constrained powers makes conservatives accept themselves as humble human beings with constrained abilities. In particular, conservatives recognize the laws of nature. By the same token, mainly atheistic "progressives" consider themselves "free of religious superstitions", but it makes them play unconstrained God themselves, thus, they are in denial of objective restrains, of the laws of nature, including human's nature and laws of Free Market. Religious conservatives know there are no free lunches and the perpetual motion machine cannot exist while "free of religious constraints" liberals still believe they can disregard the laws of nature, they can engineer society and human being-well, you know, all that "mad scientists" crap). Having family responsibilities and nurturing kids helps shape decent conservatives tremendously: family guys must think of the future and act responsibly. Moral and family values ensue from the above, stressing out individual decision making and bearing personal responsibility for their actions. Free, independant, self-relying and mature persons don't need ANY government in their lives. Thus, we, the people, allowed our enemy government only very limited tasks and delegated very limited powers, according to the best in the world Constitution. Unfortunately, our enemy government started creeping power grab a 100 years ago, and now un-Constituional power-grab became a snow ball, turning into an avalanch. If we, the people, will not stop our enemy government in November, 2010– America will go down the drain, as the Euro-Zoo already does as we speak. So, healthy conservatism is the way to the camp of America's friends for over 90% of the freedom-camp dwellers, it is the easiest, most reliable and by far the most common path to the freedom-camp. They have respect to human beings, especially to decent people, no matter what their colour of gender is. We are lucky in America that we have so much Faith (Europe as a basically Godless continent has nearly lost this most common pathway to the freedom camp, which is compounded by the wide-spread irreversible brain damage caused by the leftist educators and MSM), we have so many followers of true religions (except Islam, of course, which is not a religion but a violent, totalitarian and anti-humane ideology as long as it is based on the Sharia laws, on the islamic supremacy, on the islamofascism). As of today, Islam is the worst force of evil, the worst component of the freedom-haters camp even though many Muslims who do not follow Sharia laws are good people. Only jihadis, the devout, the pious Muslims do follow the Sharia laws, and you know the results. Good Americans of the Muslim origin don't chop off your heads, they don't think they are supreme just because they are Muslims, they don't try to eliminate all other religions and take over the world, thus, they are bad Muslims since they are against the dictates of Sharia laws, of the main stream Quran. One can be whether a good American or a good Muslim, but one never can be both. They are based on the complete opposites, incompatible with each other– the freest in the world American Constitution and the worst totalitarianism of Sharia laws, of the islamofascism. All other religions are good, they bring you to the freedom-lovers cam: Judeo-Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism, Bhuddism and the like. My little favorite is Bahaism because of their cleanest record (may be, because they were never in the position of majority, of power, which is always tempting to use). All others religions are the forces of good in today's world (may be, in 18th century it was different and in 22th century it will be different too, but today it is just a fact of the matter, judging by the end results). It's a reliable and most common way to the freedom-lovers camp.
Alternative ways: About 2% of the freedom-lovers have more complex path. They went through the education brainwashing machine in universities and colleges, they were indoctrinated and were guilty of "progressive" totalitarianism (socialists, communists and all other re-distributionists). However, the hard lessons of life helped them mature enough to realize that freedom, particularly free market, is the only way to prosperity and happiness. This pathway typically leads to the libertarian branch of the freedom lovers. Sadly, it is uncommon path and frequently people come to understanding when they are not young, not healthy and not active enough to make a diffirence in the remaining life time. In short, we should welcome those who finally came to realize the value of freedom, but we should think of this as an exception to the rule rather that as a rule. However, despite their small numbers, these reformed "progressive" liberals (and now mainly libertarians) are extremely valuable to the cause of freedom because they are highly educated, they know totalitarians inside out and they are the most articulate supporters of freedom (just look at the wisest man in America Thomas Sowell or David Horowitz). While less educated conservatives intuitively feel what the truth is these libertarians clearly articulate the truth and make it more digestable, they identify the short and long term goals of the freedom cause– in short, they serve as a nerve ganglion to the conservative body. Other alternative and rare routes to the freedom camp include objectivists, followers of Ayn Rand, individualists, proponents of free market and so forth. Now it's not a time to stress out our differences– it's time for ALL freedom-lovers to unite in order to save America, to restore our Constitution and our liberties, to stop our common totalitarian enemy, especially in Washington, DC. Let's put our differences aside, at least until we together save America from its government, from the totalitarian enemies of freedom. Even lesser totalitarian entities (state and municipal governments) will work together with the freedom-lovers to dismantle the worst enemy of the people at the federal level. When and if the feds are defeated– then we can trim the states governments too, also reducing their powers and eliminating all the un-Constitutional laws interfering with our liberties and decision making powers. For example, recent Indiana's law requiring a driving license from an 80 year old grandie when she buys a bottle of wine, or the usurped by the government "rights" to dictate what we can and what we can't do in our our own home. After that we can trim the localities and municipal level of buraucracy too, putting total halt on all-level government expansion trends.
Totalitarian freedom-haters: just opposite from the above. Typically they are lazy, not spending much time at their work place working long hours. As they say– easy come easy go. They can be rich (entertainment industry and Hollowood rich trash, speculators of the Wall Street), poor (losers on welfare) or they can be a middle class (parasitic government bureaucrats). The common feature– they don't work hard, thus, they don't appreciate hard-working people's rights to retain the fruits of their hard labor. Infantile, immature, immoral freaks, single, sexual perverts, victims of the braiwashing education machine (the most common of recruitment are through the universities and colleges– it's an assembly line where young Americans enter the college but after unrelenting leftist indoctrination graduate as anti-American totalitarian "progressives") and 96% "progressive" totalitarian MSM (main stream media). Some of them later mature, the hard lessons of real life open their eyes, the family responsibilities reform these victims. Unfortunately, for many is a life-long infectious disiease– brain damage becomes irreversible.
Totalitarian "progressives" hate decent people (may be-because decent people don't need those freaky "knights on the noble cosmic quest for justice", but the "progressives" love rats, losers and all kinds of trash (because they can show off their superiority by handing out the leftovers from their table). "Progressive" totalitarians have killed more people than more notorious kinds of totalitarians (national socialist Hitler, red communists Stalin and Pol Pot), but somehow it goes unnoticed. For example, the "green" ecofreaks organized world-wide ban on DDT, which was the only effective way to prevent malaria, and as a result those eco-freaks have killed about 120 million people via Malaria plasmodium. Thanks to the "progressives" that basically support both deadliest diseases of humanity (malaria and Islamofascism), people keep dying daily from these epidemics.
Totalitarian brainwashing machine, the delusional zombies assembly line:
Leftism is a prolonged childhood disease, an infantilism, but some kids are teenagers forever. Just like children, the Left neglects natural restraints, the laws of nature, they lack patience, the sense of personal responsibility. In order to zombie the population to be the "progressive" infantiles, statists and the Left don't miss anything that works. There is nothing accidental in the Left's agenda, they have a perfect built-in magnet, they know exactly what is bad for the freedom cause, what is bad for Free Market and, thus, bad for the people. That could help you make up your mind– ask a totalitarian, in America’s case ask “progressive” Democrats, and do exactly opposite from what they want. Or just simply observe– if the “progressive” Democrats pursue some ideas, goals, laws– then you know that is something bad for the people, no matter how beautiful the demagoguery wrap-crap is. The Right is usually ritht, but it is not 100% consistent. Occasionally conservatives can be wrong, especially when influced by the people's enemies ("educators" and MSM). However, you can bet that the totalitarians, including the leftist "progressive" Democrats and other statists, are always and 100% wrong, whatever they push for. You can analyze for your self: dichotomize any idea that the Left tries to push yo your throat, and you will see for yourself why the risk/benefit ratio is always bad in spite of state of the art demagoguery about their good intentions and claimed "benefits". Benefits whether never materialize or are too costly, but you can be sure that the end result is always the expanding government powers and budget, which means your powers and budgets are getting smaller. Let's pick some examples (the rest is your homework;-)
Public transportation: when you put aside the leftist propaganda and impartially analyze it, then the public transportation is economically disastrous, ecologically disadvantegous, but it turns the independant human beings into the herded cattle, which is the goal of the totalitarian freedom-haters. When Americans drive– they keep their independance and decision making skills up. They must have plan, sense of direction, they must constantly re-evaluate the changing envoronment and situation, they must actively participate in the process. When the Euro-Zoo dwellers or the commuters in the socialist states herded in the wagons and trains then they lose their independance skills. Skills are always like that: you use it-or you lose it. We are what we are doing daily. So, generations in Euro-Zoo lost their independant living skills, they became totally domesticated, castrated and lobotomized by the Almighty Nanny State animals (although the highly educated animals, which make them think they are superiors to Americans just because in Europe there are more university educated folks, who have sustained more irreversible brain damage due to the leftist indoctrination in universities), and the 100% totalitarian leftist media don't let them understand whats going on.
MSM. Only about 5% of population are independant thinkers under any conditions, they are able to figure it out despite the propagand, but majority of us need some objective information to make an informed decision, and this is what completely missing in the totalitarian societies, even in the previously softer Euro-totalitarianism. Everything is filtered, biased, the main goal of the media is to disinform, to misinform, to form public opinion, to impose moral "standards" (namely, "moral relativity" theory, which more correctly should be called "immoral relativity theory"), totally blinding political correctness and enforced "multiculturalism" (if it is the result of natural development via free market mechanism– it's fine, but when it's imposed by force– then the difference is just like between lovemaking and rape. It holds true generally– anything attained through the Free Market self-regulating mechanisms versus imposed by the coercive government is like a difference between lovemaking and rape). Thus, majority of Europeans have no sourse of information and damaged by the totalitarian indoctrination brains to even realize that they are doomed to go extint because of "too much government" catastrophe and that they are being brought by their own Nanny States to the slaughter houses of the islamofascism, the gravedigger of the suicidal Euro-socialism.
"Educators": Very possibly that it is the most destructive component of the totalitarian brainwashing and leftist indoctrination in the West. In order to make this weapon that effective, the totalitarians first must remove it from the exposure to the forces of good, of the self-regulated Free Market, which wouldn't allow destruction of education and replacement by the anti-Americans production assembly line. This is called "nationalization of the education system". The nationalization disrupts the feedback from the end-users, from the people, from Americans, making the schools the ward of the totalitarian by its nature Almighty Government that protects the "educators" as long as they do government's bidding– stealing the kids from families, making the Almighty Government and totalitarian ideologies the masters, the only authority for the kids. All totalitarians use schools to brainwash kids while their brains are especially sensitive, as early as they can. Hitler used Hitler-jugend organization, in USSR "Octyabryata" at age of 6–7, "pioneers" 10–11, "comsomol" 14–15. On Norway the government takes away to a government run kindergarten when your children are 1 year old. Obama and the leftist "educators" push for pre-schools and all totalitarians use schools to brainwash kids. The leftist indoctrination is less pronounced in elementary education because there is still feedback from the community, from the families. The more feedback from the parents, from the society is disrupted by the “educators” under the government protections, the worse it gets. Universities and colleges, especially in the non-applied science (in short, in blah-blah-blology disciplines such as art, justice, psychology, social studies and the like, with the worse ones that are completely made up -like gender studies in astronomy, physics and chemistry crap). The main goal of the “educators” is not to educate you kids, but to use your many to turn your kids up against you, to create anti-Americans from young Americans, to teach them to hate freedom, free market, America and their own parents. Did you ask yourself, why seemingly smart and educated people in the New England follow idiocy of the “totalitarian” national suicide? Smart but stupid? Why seemingly less educated and down to earth Texans are so rich with the common sense and even wise? Humble but wise? Because the 92% “progressive” so called “education system” (in fact, the brainwashing centers) cause irreversible damage to the students, who lose their common sense and ability to judge according to the end results rather than according to the “noble intentions”. Why 78% of the American Jews voted for the anti-semitic and anti-Israeli Husein Obama? Because a lot of Jews are highly educated professionals, who also suffered irreversible brain damage in the run by the totalitarian “progressives” colleges and universities. As it turns out, learning several colloquial fancy words doesn’t make you any wiser.
Of course, the totalitarian enemies of the people in MSM will provide with massive cover up, they will disguise the destructive goals with demagoguery appealing to the emotions and never to the reasons and evidence based hard facts. It's always for the "improvement" of the "disadvantaged ones" (even though there NEVER was an instance of improvement of ANYTHING NATIONALIZED, be it the oil industry in Venezuela, factories in North Korea or schooling in the US). The results are always the same: the quality is progressively worsening (which the totalitarians coudln't really care less about), but the government gets more power, control and money. Next thing– infiltration by the hostile ideology. The people's enemies must infiltrate the education system. Now over 92% of the university teachers vote for the “progressive” enemies of America. Infiltration is done by different mechanisms, and you can successfully analyze this process and find much more of them yourself. One of them is the massive infiltration using hostile socialist ideology of the labor unions. The unions are based on the socialist principled of the redistribution from those who create weath to those who are organized enough to blackmail and shakedown unearned bucks. The stronger the unions, the bigger the proportion of un-earned money squized from the society ( by strikes, blackmailing, shakedowns, collective bargaining and other arm twisting techniques), the less productive the society gets. Unionization of automotive industry and of education are examples how they ruin the quality, productivity and make us lose global competition.
