Цитаты из книги «Орландо», страница 36

Эту, какого бы ни была она пола, особу, небольшого роста и редкой стройности, всю облекали устричного цвета бархаты, отороченные невиданным зеленоватым мехом. Но подробности затмевались ослепительной соблазнительностью особы. В мозгу Орландо сплетались и свивались самые дерзкие и странные метафоры. Он назвал ее дыней, ананасом, оливой, изумрудом, лисицей на снегу – и все за три секунды; он сам не знал, видел он ее, слышал, пробовал на вкус или все это сразу. (Ибо, хотя мы обязаны ни на мгновение не прерываться в своем повествовании, нам придется, однако, походя пояснить, что все образы его в то время были чрезвычайно просты, под стать его же чувствам, и по большей части внушены простыми навыками детства. Но, будучи просты, чувства его были и на редкость сильны.

Возможно, Орландо и виноват; но, в конце концов, нам ли его судить? Век был елизаветинский; их нравы были не то что наши нравы; ну и поэты тоже, и климат, и даже овощи. Все было иное. Сама погода, холод и жара летом и зимой были, надо полагать, совсем, совсем иного градуса. Сияющий, влюбленный день отграничивался от ночи так же четко, как вода от суши. Закаты были гуще – красней; рассветы – аврористее и белей. О наших сумерках, межвременье, о медленно и скучно скудеющем свете не было тогда и помину. Дождь или хлестал ливмя, или уж совсем не шел. Солнце сияло – или стояла тьма. Переводя все это в область метафизики, как водится у них, поэты прелестно пели о том, как вянут розы, опадают лепестки. Миг краток, они пели, миг минует, и долгой ночью все уснут. Ухищрения теплиц и оранжерей ради сохранности летучих лепестков и мигов – были не по их части. О вялых затеях и половинчатости нашего усталого и сомнительного века они понятия не имели. Во всем был напор. Цветок цветет, вянет. Солнце встает, заходит. Влюбленный любит, бросает свой предмет. И то, что поэты рекомендовали в стихах, юноши исполняли на деле. Девушки были – розы. Красота их была быстротечна, как красота цветка. Их следовало рвать до наступления темноты, ибо день краток и день – все. А потому, если Орландо, следуя велению климата, поэтов, самого века, сорвал с подоконника цветок, когда на землю выпал снег, а рядом бдела Королева, – неужто мы его осудим? Он был молод, неискушен – он уступал природе. Что же до девушки, мы не лучше королевы Елизаветы знаем ее имя. Дорис, Хлорис, Делия, Диана? Он всех по очереди их зарифмовал. Это могла быть знатная леди, могла быть и служанка. У Орландо был широкий вкус – он любил не одни садовые цветы: полевые цветочки, даже сорные травы равно пленяли его воображение.

Да, но каков он изнутри? Она воткнула в него желтый ястребиный взор, словно намереваясь насквозь пробуравить душу. Он не дрогнул, только зарделся, как дамасская роза, что ему очень шло и подобало. Сила, благородство, возвышенность мечтаний, безрассудство, юность, поэзия, – она читала как по раскрытой книге.

The beautiful, glittering name fell out of the sky like a steel-blue feather. She watched it fall, turning and twisting like a slow-falling arrow that cleaves the deep air beautifully. He was coming, as he always came, in moments of dead calm; when the wave rippled and the spotted leaves fell slowly over her foot in the autumn woods; when the leopard was still; the moon was on the waters, and nothing moved in between sky and sea. Then he came.

For if there are (at a venture) seventy-six different times all ticking in the mind at once, how many different people are there not - Heaven help us - all having lodgment at one time or another in the human spirit? Some say two thousand and fifty-two. So that it is the most usual thing in the world for a person to call, directly they are alone, Orlando? (if that is one's name) meaning by that, Come, come! I'm sick to death of this particular self. I want another. Hence, the astonishing changes we see in our friends. But it is not altogether plain sailing, either, for though one may say, as Orlando said (being out in the country and needing another self presumably) Orlando? still the Orlando she needs may not come; these selves of which we are built up, one on top of another, as plates are piled on a waiter's hand, have attachments elsewhere, sympathies, little constitutions and rights of their own, call them what you will (and for many of these things there is no name) so that one will only come if it is raining, another in a room with green curtains, another when Mrs Jones is not there, another if you can promise it a glass of wine - and so on; for everybody can multiply from his own experience the different terms which his different selves have made with him - and some are too wildly ridiculous to be mentioned in print at all.

And indeed, it cannot be denied that the most successful practitioners of the art of life, often unknown people by the way, somehow contrive to synchronize the sixty or seventy different times which beat simultaneously in every normal human system so that when eleven strikes, all the rest chime in unison, and the present is neither a violent disruption nor completely forgotten in the past. Of them we can justly say that they live precisely the sixty-eight or seventy-two years allotted them on the tombstone. Of the rest some we know to be dead though they walk among us; some are not yet born though they go through the forms of life; others are hundreds of years old though they call themselves thirty-six. The true length of a person's life, whatever the "Dictionary of National Biography" may say, is always a matter of dispute. For it is a difficult business - this time-keeping; nothing more quickly disorders it than contact with any of the arts.

Hail! natural desire! Hail! happiness! divine happiness! and pleasure of all sorts, flowers and wine, though one fades and the other intoxicates; and half-crown tickets out of London on Sundays, and singing in a dark chapel hymns about death, and anything, anything that interrupts and confounds the tapping of typewriters and filing of letters and forging of links and chains, binding the Empire together. Hail even the crude, red bows on shop girls' lips (as if Cupid, very clumsily, dipped his thumb in red ink and scrawled a token in passing). Hail, happiness! kingfisher flashing from bank to bank, and all fulfilment of natural desire, whether it is what the male novelist says it is; or prayer; or denial; hail! in whatever form it comes, and may there be more forms, and stranger. For dark flows the stream - would it were true, as the rhyme hints 'like a dream' - but duller and worser than that is our usual lot; without dreams, but alive, smug, fluent, habitual, under trees whose shade of an olive green drowns the blue of the wing of the vanishing bird when he darts of a sudden from bank to bank.Hail, happiness, then, and after happiness, hail not those dreams which bloat the sharp image as spotted mirrors do the face in a country-inn parlour; dreams which splinter the whole and tear us asunder and wound us and split us apart in the night when we would sleep; but sleep, sleep, so deep that all shapes are ground to dust of infinite softness, water of dimness inscrutable, and there, folded, shrouded, like a mummy, like a moth, prone let us lie on the sand at the bottom of sleep.

She had thought of literature all these years (her seclusion, her rank, her sex must be her excuse) as something wild as the wind, hot as fire, swift as lightning; something errant, incalculable, abrupt, and behold, literature was an elderly gentleman in a grey suit talking about duchesses.

Surely, since she is a woman, and a beautiful woman, and a woman in the prime of life, she will soon give over this pretence of writing and thinking and begin at least to think of a gamekeeper (and as long as she thinks of a man, nobody objects to a woman thinking). And then she will write him a little note (and as long as she writes little notes nobody objects to a woman writing either) and make an assignation for Sunday dusk and Sunday dusk will come; and the gamekeeper will whistle under the window - all of which is, of course, the very stuff of life and the only possible subject for fiction. Surely Orlando must have done one of these things? Alas, - a thousand times, alas, Orlando did none of them. Must it then be admitted that Orlando was one of those monsters of iniquity who do not love? She was kind to dogs, faithful to friends, generosity itself to a dozen starving poets, had a passion for poetry. But love - as the male novelists define it - and who, after all, speak with greater authority? - has nothing whatever to do with kindness, fidelity, generosity, or poetry. Love is slipping off one's petticoat and - But we all know what love is. Did Orlando do that? Truth compels us to say no, she did not. If then, the subject of one's biography will neither love nor kill, but will only think and imagine, we may conclude that he or she is no better than a corpse and so leave her.

And here it must be explained, that when she called him by the first syllable of his first name, she was in a dreamy, amorous, acquiescent mood, domestic, languid a little, as if spiced logs were burning, and it was evening, yet not time to dress, and a thought wet perhaps outside, enough to make the leaves glisten, but a nightingale might be singing even so among the azaleas, two or three dogs barking at distant farms, a cock crowing - all of which the reader should imagine in her voice.