Читать книгу: «America under enemy rule and the world as it is», страница 13

Islamofascism, islamization of the world: discussions of the options.

As long as islam is based on the anti-humane Shariah laws islam is not a religion and the correct term should be islamofascism. What are the options, the ways to counteract islamofascization of the world? Let's see…

1) How about full-blown clash of civilization-"Eye for eye, tooth for tooth"– treat Muslims exactly the same way they treat non-Muslim minorities in their country with simmetrical response to the atrocities of islamofascism? If American diplomats cannot have a Christian prayer even within their Embassy in Saudia-then prohibit any Islam practice in the West until Churches, Hindu Shrines and Synagogues are built in Mecca. If Muslims commit genocide against the Christians by millions in Sudan now, in Turkey in 1915…No..can't do..it's a crime, it's not practical and, more importantly, it means going as low as islam is. More civilizied societies cannot commit the same crimes that islam does daily without moral degradation. We cannot behave as bad as our enemy because otherwise we loose our moral superiority over islam.

2) Expecting Mother nature to take care of this disease. There is a slight chance that a new epidemics will wipe out the worst jihadists because they go to mosques 5 times a day and in the crowd have more chances to contract a new emerging deadly disease. One disease wipes our another disease, a bird flu wipes out jihadists, while more peaceful and less fanatic muslims will stay home and survive. Well, it sound plausible but what the chances are? Can we rely on mother nature to contain the enemy of humanity? No.

3) Switch to alternative sources of energy and let these savages rot in their sands. Not practical, because the West is on the narcotic of the oil with no real alternatives in sight. Besides, they are not savages anymore in a sense of technological advancement– they bought for their petroleum dollars enough stuff to survive. In addition, there too many of them in the West already, and purely demographically islamofascism takes over in Europe already.

4) To reform islam, to remove the anti-humane genocidal Shariah from Quran and from teachings, to make Islam true religion that IS compatible with other religions and civilizations. This sounds great, but who will do that? Since jihad in the absense of formidable counter-war efforts so far wins the war, then majority of the Muslims have no incentives, no intention of changing anything. The "progressive" liberal monopoly in 96% of American and in 100% of European MSM are to blame for this politically correct blindness and, thus, the lack of decisive fighting back. You cannot fight your enemy if you are prohibited even naming You-Know-Who Shariah laws. Main stream media cover up and protect main stream islamofascism. Tiny groups of moderate Muslims like Dr. Tariq that collect signitures to remove Shariah from Islam are marginalized and threatened by the radical mainstream Islam: 80% of mosques in America are taken over by the hateful wahabis, using Saudis money. So, the Muslims must be forced to reform Islam to get rid of anti-humane Shariah laws. How?

a)Worldwide ban on Shariah laws, requiring lie detectors when give immigration visas or/and citizenship to the Muslims in order to answer just one question with 2 choices: Do you recognize the law of the country as the Supreme Law of the land? Or Shariah law? And if it Shariah– good bye, go back to islamofascist countries. Don't even start about discrimination of religion– islam is not a religion yet, Islam is the hostile to the freedom, to the West and it is the worst totalitarian ideology and the law system hell-bent on one thing: destroying other civilizations and taking over the world.

b) Formation of "Infidel United" instead of dismantled ASAP UN (because the latter is not reformable, it has became the tool of totalitarians and must be dissolved immediately);

c) Forming coalition of the willing with joint military to contain and to defeat decisively any attempt of genocide by the Muslims whether it happens in Sudan, Macedonia, Nigeria, Albania or Bosnia. Sobering decisive military defeat would be the strongest motivation for Muslims to reform Islam. If Mr. Emerson's calculation is true, the militant jihadis comprise 15% of the Muslims, which is about 200 million of crazy homo-suicidal maniacs, but we don't have to kill all of them– just recisive defeat will demoralize them enough to reatreat. After decisive defeat Hitler's Germany went through de-nazification. Japan after decisive defeat underwent de-militarization. All islamofascist countries must undergo de-Shariahzation, de-islamofascization. Then and only then the 1,400 year old jihad will be stopped.So, if and when the Muslims will reform islam throwing to the garbage antihumane Shariah laws– then Islam might become true religion and only then it can start enjoying the same treatment as normal religions. I am not a military expert, but "social engineering" and the "nation building" does not seem like a plausible idea. The best altruistic way is to be egoistic, just like at the society level. If you and I do our personal best to prosper in the life and to pursie happiness, then our country will consist of a lot of prosperous and happy people with individual success stories. Otherwise, as the experience of ALL futile attempts to build an egalitarian society has proven multiple times with NO EXCEPTIONS, the true equality has never been reached: the country was divided into equally poor beggars and somewhat richer ruling elite, be it in Russia, China, North Korea or somewhere else. The same way, America should pursue its own interests and let the natural course of events flow, unless our interests are affected. The main mode of action should be serving as an example how much the freedom, the Free Market can accomplish. The main diplomacy should be a popular diplomacy– people to people, not our enemy government to their enemy government. If some bastards threaten our interests– then don't punish the whole country but rather take them out, individually, using surgical strikes, high technology, specops, cruise missiles and the like without wasting American lives and money to change the ways of lives of the hostile countries. Anyway, it's costly, it's improbable to be accomplished and we bear no responsibility for our enemies. Saddam Hussein was threatening America's interests? Hit his 12 palaces with 12 cruise missiles, and the conflict is over. The next ruler will learn the message:"Don't mess up with America". Iran is threatening vital interests of America? Take out the crazy mullocrahcy and don't interfere with the Iranian people's reforms afterword. Let their societies mature according to their own pace. If it takes 40 years-so be it, Don't even try to facilitate this process for several years at the very high human and financial cost. If the people ask for help-then help them to learn how to catch the fish. If they don't– the wisdom says "Let it be". If a Chineese state capitalism tries to take away the mineral resources around the world to take advantage of their military power-then act accordingly, and for that reason "If you wish for peace– be ready for a war". Meanwhile Obama closed the production of F-22, the only interceptor that can match Chineese fighters. If crazy North Korea or Burma's dictators don't comply with our nuclear disarmament demands– take out their crooked dictators and let the people to rectify the situation. Don't fight on a massive scale, don't punish the people for the faults of the dictators– those dictators don't care about deaths of their own people.

Australian PM Rudd bravely said:" Immigrants, not Australians, must adapt. Take it or leave it. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individuals or their culture. Since the terrorist attack on Bali, we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians. We speak English, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, CHinese, Japanese, Russian or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society-learn language! Most Australians believe in God, This is not some Christian right wing political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on CHristian principles, founded this nations, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as new home, because God is part of our culture. We accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask it that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us. This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and gripping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom: THE RIGHT TO LEAVE! If you aren't happy here then LEAVE. We didn't force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country you accepted."

Apparently, mental illness of "progressivism" includes also cognitive dissociation, narcissim, delusional ideation, denial of reality, behaving in the real world according to what is supposed to be in the imaginatory "ideal" world and so forth. I think, all the Democrats and other totalitarians must be under constant psychiatric re-evaluation every 3 months to make sure they won't harm public when elected. "Progessives" just can't see the objective reality, they stick to their delisions that they are the noble knights on the noble cosmic quest for justice (while in fact they are enemy of freedom, thus, enemy of the people) while trying to villify all their ideological and political opponents. When 70% of Americans oppose Obamunism, then delusional leftist MSM try to portray mainstream America as bigots and racists; when in an interview a dissillusioned Afroamerican Democrats says she will not vote for Obama anymore-the leftist MSM as always avoid the issue discussion but they start personal attacks accusing of bad motives or being "hired by GOP". "Progressives" always fail to discuss the matter, the whole picture and to prove their point resorting instead to character assassination, personal attacks, smearing campaign and picking a subjective emotionally charged examples like "Mary from Nebraska has a sick child and she supports.." whatever is the "progressive" soup opera of the day. Who's hired 70% of AMericans then? It's predictable and inevitable failures of redistributionist models (socialism, Eurosocialism, communism and the like) that mobilize Americans against their enemies in Washington, DC, not some crazy conspiracies. Blame yourselves, Democrats, when you lose in 2010.

No task you hope the government to perform will ever be done. Government's "cure" is always worse than the original ill, and when government's intervention inevitably creates more problems than it "solves", then it creates excuses for the further power and money grab.You hope the government will prevent monopolization, evil big corporations ending free competition? But involving the government is the worst possible "solution". For one, you give the government powers to decide, which corporations are good and wich are evil. The power corrupts. To err is human. You gave more power to government and you created for human beings positions of power. The government that you hoped will control monopolization instead inevitably will pick sides in exchange for favors, so you created the crony capitalism, you created "too big to fail" system that promotes any reckless decisions by the corporations to be bailed out, you weakened the free market forces and, thus, you've worsened the outcome of all processes in economy and society. So, who will then prevent monopolization? An open free market, a global village, where on the global scale even immobile big corporations are small, and small, mobile and resourseful companies can get an edge of advantage. Open the market and close the government (keep it only for foreign affairs). After so many years of always harmful government interventions there are accumulated many imbalances, disproportions and inner pressures within the country. Some catharsis, some purge, some cleaning is inevitable. "Too big too fail" in reality means "Too big to exist". Even in the US with it's traditions of enterpreneurship many "Too big to fail" behemots will fall apart to the bricks when exposed to the global Free Market competition. Then the invisible hand of Free Market will build from these bricks, from the ashes a Phoenix of the renewed America, again the country of freedom, prosperity and greatness. Virtually any area of human activity is best managed by self-regulation with feedback loop, by freedom, by free market. Government as a tool of coercion has no or minimal feed back loop, thus, any government interference inevitably hurts the self-regulation and worsens the outcome. Government is doomed to do wrong anything it tries just by the government's coercive nature.

We just must learn the fact, the axiom that there is nothing a government can fix, nothing good a government can do, that government is our enemy, a necessary evil, that should be given ONLY tasks that Free Market cannot do (yet), which is border protection and foreign affairs. Even here government is doomed to do a lousy job, but until the good magician of Free Market is up to the task we have to hire a mercenary,our enemy government, to fill the gap. Obviously, hiring private companies like "Blackwater" based on the free competition bids would protect our borders much better than Obama's regime, which not only doesn't fulfill its duty to protect our borders from criminals, islamic terrorists and illegals but even hinders Arizona's and Texas' efforts to protect the border. The only duty a government performs quite well is a duty of the people's enemy. Popular sovereignty, direct popular diplomacy, popular self-governance is the best possible way to optimize the dynamic stability processes and their outcomes in economy and society. Unintended "consequences" of Free Market are freedom, self-respect, self-reliance, prosperity and true progress. Unintended consequences of redistributionist "social justice" are poverty, moral crisis with the losers on welfare and parasites in the government and totalitarianism. Freedom is the only thing that made America great and freedom, particularly free market, will make America great again, if we, the people, will defeat our enemy Big Government in November, 2010.

XII. Current situation and developing trends in the US & in the world

Current situation doesn't look too promising. A lot of countries fail because of the lack of freedom and too much government. Of course, their governments look for scape goats to shift responsibilities for their own faults, and blame the rich countries. Poor country are poor because they don't have free enough market, the freedom to make individual decisions, the lack of self-regulation with the feedback loop. Rich countries are rich because they have freer market, more individual freedoms and less opressive governments. Freedom is the most potent economic power, the engine of progress. Many in the poor countries like to think that "the rich countries got rich on the back of the poor countries", but there is nothing to get rich from– less free countries have so low GDP they cannot even sustain their own population, not mentioning to make someone else rich. You want to become rich? Wrestle with your government, don't let it control anything in your life, get back your freedoms– and you definitely will become rich. Honkong became the story of success because the people made their own decisions and enjoyed the fruit of their hard labor themselves. Free and prosperous country consists of free and prosperous people. Thanks to the Honkong, the mainland China followed its lead in some degree, and with more freedom, with freer market the China's standing improved proportionally to the degree of freedom. You want more prosperity? Get more freedom from your government. So far the best chance to prosper has India– it has shifted from the failed socialist redistributionism to the freer market model; it is self-relying system, building itself very proportionally with the minimal distortions; it has more or less reliable, predictable and independant judicial system and the rule of law. Unlike China, India growth is stable while China is a colossus on the clay legs: it disproportional, it's crony capitalism, it's like a snake eating its own tail for sustenance, which cannot last too long. In 20 years China will have the same demographic and economic problems Europe has right now. Idnia meanwhile will keep its smooth and steady growth, unless hindered by the conflict with neibouring islamofascist countries or their fifth column in India proper.

Unfortunately, the degree of freedom, individual liberties and free market is decreasing in majority of the countries, in essential degree due to the totalitarization of the world in the worst possible form (islamization). As you know, the whole Islam in its current form is based on the anti-humane Shariah law, which is the engine of the perpetual jihad against all other civilization during last 1,400 years, since the conception of this violent and intolerant ideology and practive by the first Muslim terrorist Muhammed. If and when the Muslims will reform Islam, removing the genocidal Shariah laws, then Islam might become a normal religion that can coexist with other civilizations.

One can break down the countries into a) developed countries with measurable individual freedoms, first of all free market, and high per capita GDP; b) developing countries that improve their position on the position above; c) stagnant countries with no significant changes; d) retarding countries that have their individual liberties, free market and, thus, economic growth worsening; e) retarded countries (such as Zimbabwe and Sudan) where the dictatorships basically took away all the freedoms, including free market, from their own people and, thus, took away all the prospects of prosperity. Freedom, particularly free market, and a right to make decisions for ourselves, is the only thing that can bring prosperity, but your own government doesn't let it happen because the free people need almost no government, which menas the ruling elite, the oligarchy will have much less money sticking to their hands with the decreasing degree of redistribution of your money. Yes, the people will definitely benefit from the more freedom, more productive economy, but the ruling elite will lose some of their money and power, and that's why they will block your attempts to gain more freedom from the government. It's the islamofascist Arabs' regimes that keep their population poor, not Israel. Just opposite– the Arabs should come to Israel to learn how more freedom translates into more prosperity and happiness for the people. But the Arabs regimes want to disdtract their people from the real culprits, from the Arab regimes and totalitarian ideology based on Shariah laws, and they blame America and Israel for their own faults. So, your main enemy, your main obstacle on the road to prosperity is your own government, your own totalitarian ideology. Control your government, reform Islam to get read of the Shariah laws– and you will be free and prosperous people.

Sadly, even in the developed world the totalitarianism creeps in faster and faster, the Nanny States and the socialists take over bigger and bigger share of the economy, which hurts economy and demographics worse and worse. Worsening totalitarianization will in a short time destroy the European Union. The crisis in Greece is just a forbinger of the worse, of the domino effect, of collapsing EU. It's painfully simple– less freedom will inevitably translate into less prosperity. So far America is also hard hit by the redistributionists, by the Democratic socialists. Our only hope is that the fall 2010 elections will politically castrate Obama and stop the destruction of America. Then with the next president we shall try to reverse the damage done by the totalitarian enemies of America in Washington, DC, restoring original American Constitution, individual liberties and Free Market.

In South America the political swing so far also was for the worse. Venezuela's dictator Chavez bought a lot of governments in the region using petroleum dollars. Brazilian and many other governments are heavily infiltrated by the communists, socialists and other totalitarians, Iranian and other islamofascists also infiltrate the region. However, the socialism in several years will exert the sobering effect on the population: people in Venezuela started starving now while the government with its usual "expediency" let the food rot in containers. It means that within the same time frame as EU collapses (which is 5 to 10 years), the Socialist International, the unholy allience of all totalitarian enemies of the people under the Chavez will collapse as well. Totalitarians base called the UN also could fall apart within the same time interval, which would be a great development. All this positive developments would represent a great opportunity to promote the ideas of freedom, of free market and prosperity into the masses. As you know, when the ideas conquer the masses then the ideas become a physical force of reforms. So, there is a hope that the discredited distributinism, the totalitarianism will be replaced in essential degree with the Free Market and individual liberties.

The worst problems on hands, of course, is the islamofascism. This agressive antity, like an aliens from the space, threatens the very existence of all human civilizations. So far it can be stopped only with a decisive military victory, and the ensuing crisis of islamofascism should push Muslim reformers on the front line. If and when today's tiny and threatened minority of moderate Muslims will become a mainstream and will manage to remove anti-humane Shariah laws from Islam, then and only then Islam might become a normal religion that will be eble to co-exist with others. As of today, based on Shariah laws Islam is a form of fascism, it is the worst possible totalitarian system, and it is the threat to all mankind.